lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 26 May 2021 13:38:27 +0300
From:   Leonard Crestez <cdleonard@...il.com>
To:     Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>,
        Matt Mathis <mattmathis@...gle.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
        John Heffner <johnwheffner@...il.com>,
        Leonard Crestez <lcrestez@...venets.com>,
        Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@...gle.com>,
        Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [RFCv2 3/3] tcp: Wait for sufficient data in tcp_mtu_probe

According to RFC4821 Section 7.4 "Protocols MAY delay sending non-probes
in order to accumulate enough data" but linux almost never does that.

Implement this by returning 0 from tcp_mtu_probe if not enough data is
queued locally but some packets are still in flight. This makes mtu
probing more likely to happen for applications that do small writes.

Only doing this if packets are in flight should ensure that writing will
be attempted again later. This is similar to how tcp_mtu_probe already
returns zero if the probe doesn't fit inside the receiver window or the
congestion window.

Control this with a sysctl because this implies a latency tradeoff but
only up to one RTT.

Signed-off-by: Leonard Crestez <cdleonard@...il.com>
---
 Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.rst |  5 +++++
 include/net/netns/ipv4.h               |  1 +
 net/ipv4/sysctl_net_ipv4.c             |  7 +++++++
 net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c                    |  1 +
 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c                  | 18 ++++++++++++++----
 5 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.rst b/Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.rst
index 7ab52a105a5d..967b7fac35b1 100644
--- a/Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.rst
+++ b/Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.rst
@@ -349,10 +349,15 @@ tcp_mtu_probe_floor - INTEGER
 	If MTU probing is enabled this caps the minimum MSS used for search_low
 	for the connection.
 
 	Default : 48
 
+tcp_mtu_probe_waitdata - BOOLEAN
+	Wait for enough data for an mtu probe to accumulate on the sender.
+
+	Default: 1
+
 tcp_mtu_probe_rack - BOOLEAN
 	Try to use shorter probes if RACK is also enabled
 
 	Default: 1
 
diff --git a/include/net/netns/ipv4.h b/include/net/netns/ipv4.h
index b4ff12f25a7f..366e7b325778 100644
--- a/include/net/netns/ipv4.h
+++ b/include/net/netns/ipv4.h
@@ -112,10 +112,11 @@ struct netns_ipv4 {
 #ifdef CONFIG_NET_L3_MASTER_DEV
 	u8 sysctl_tcp_l3mdev_accept;
 #endif
 	u8 sysctl_tcp_mtu_probing;
 	int sysctl_tcp_mtu_probe_floor;
+	int sysctl_tcp_mtu_probe_waitdata;
 	int sysctl_tcp_mtu_probe_rack;
 	int sysctl_tcp_base_mss;
 	int sysctl_tcp_min_snd_mss;
 	int sysctl_tcp_probe_threshold;
 	u32 sysctl_tcp_probe_interval;
diff --git a/net/ipv4/sysctl_net_ipv4.c b/net/ipv4/sysctl_net_ipv4.c
index 275c91fb9cf8..53868b812958 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/sysctl_net_ipv4.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/sysctl_net_ipv4.c
@@ -847,10 +847,17 @@ static struct ctl_table ipv4_net_table[] = {
 		.mode		= 0644,
 		.proc_handler	= proc_dointvec_minmax,
 		.extra1		= &tcp_min_snd_mss_min,
 		.extra2		= &tcp_min_snd_mss_max,
 	},
+	{
+		.procname	= "tcp_mtu_probe_waitdata",
+		.data		= &init_net.ipv4.sysctl_tcp_mtu_probe_waitdata,
+		.maxlen		= sizeof(int),
+		.mode		= 0644,
+		.proc_handler	= proc_dointvec,
+	},
 	{
 		.procname	= "tcp_mtu_probe_rack",
 		.data		= &init_net.ipv4.sysctl_tcp_mtu_probe_rack,
 		.maxlen		= sizeof(int),
 		.mode		= 0644,
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
index ed8af4a7325b..940df2ae4636 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
@@ -2892,10 +2892,11 @@ static int __net_init tcp_sk_init(struct net *net)
 	net->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_base_mss = TCP_BASE_MSS;
 	net->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_min_snd_mss = TCP_MIN_SND_MSS;
 	net->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_probe_threshold = TCP_PROBE_THRESHOLD;
 	net->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_probe_interval = TCP_PROBE_INTERVAL;
 	net->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_mtu_probe_floor = TCP_MIN_SND_MSS;
+	net->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_mtu_probe_waitdata = 1;
 	net->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_mtu_probe_rack = 1;
 
 	net->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_keepalive_time = TCP_KEEPALIVE_TIME;
 	net->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_keepalive_probes = TCP_KEEPALIVE_PROBES;
 	net->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_keepalive_intvl = TCP_KEEPALIVE_INTVL;
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
index 362f97cfb09e..268e1bac001f 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
@@ -2394,14 +2394,10 @@ static int tcp_mtu_probe(struct sock *sk)
 		 */
 		tcp_mtu_check_reprobe(sk);
 		return -1;
 	}
 
-	/* Have enough data in the send queue to probe? */
-	if (tp->write_seq - tp->snd_nxt < size_needed)
-		return -1;
-
 	/* Can probe fit inside congestion window? */
 	if (packets_needed > tp->snd_cwnd)
 		return -1;
 
 	/* Can probe fit inside receiver window? If not then skip probing.
@@ -2411,10 +2407,24 @@ static int tcp_mtu_probe(struct sock *sk)
 	 * clear below.
 	 */
 	if (tp->snd_wnd < size_needed)
 		return -1;
 
+	/* Have enough data in the send queue to probe? */
+	if (tp->write_seq - tp->snd_nxt < size_needed) {
+		/* If packets are already in flight it's safe to wait for more data to
+		 * accumulate on the sender because writing will be triggered as ACKs
+		 * arrive.
+		 * If no packets are in flight returning zero can stall.
+		 */
+		if (net->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_mtu_probe_waitdata &&
+		    tcp_packets_in_flight(tp))
+			return 0;
+		else
+			return -1;
+	}
+
 	/* Do we need for more acks to clear the receive window? */
 	if (after(tp->snd_nxt + size_needed, tcp_wnd_end(tp)))
 		return 0;
 
 	/* Do we need the congestion window to clear? */
-- 
2.25.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ