netdev - Re: [PATCH v2] lockdown,selinux: avoid bogus SELinux lockdown permission checks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 27 May 2021 14:28:11 +1000 (AEST)
From:   James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
To:     Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@...hat.com>
cc:     Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Linux Security Module list 
        <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Stephen Smalley <stephen.smalley.work@...il.com>,
        SElinux list <selinux@...r.kernel.org>,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, network dev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
        Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] lockdown,selinux: avoid bogus SELinux lockdown
 permission checks

On Wed, 26 May 2021, Ondrej Mosnacek wrote:

> Thanks, Michael!
> 
> James/Paul, is there anything blocking this patch from being merged?
> Especially the BPF case is causing real trouble for people and the
> only workaround is to broadly allow lockdown::confidentiality in the
> policy.

It would be good to see more signoffs/reviews, especially from Paul, but 
he is busy with the io_uring stuff.

Let's see if anyone else can look at this in the next couple of days.

-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@...ei.org>