lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 27 May 2021 06:24:26 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>
Cc:     Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
        Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [QUESTION] BPF kernel selftests failed in the LTS stable kernel
 4.19.x

On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 10:27:51AM +0800, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> When update the following LTS stable kernel 4.19.x,
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/log/?h=linux-4.19.y
> 
> and then run BPF selftests according to
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/bpf/bpf_devel_QA.html#q-how-to-run-bpf-selftests
> 
> $ cd tools/testing/selftests/bpf/
> $ make
> $ sudo ./test_verifier
> $ sudo make run_tests
> 
> there exists many failures include verifier tests and run_tests,
> (1) is it necessary to make sure that there are no any failures in the LTS
> stable kernel 4.19.x?

Yes, it would be nice if that did not happen.

> (2) if yes, how to fix these failures in the LTS stable kernel 4.19.x?

Can you find the offending commits by using `git bisect` and find the
upstream commits that resolve this and let us know so we can backport
them?

thanks,

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ