[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dfd44cb9-5ccc-0fcf-b91c-9d68227d6b3b@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2021 09:44:00 -0700
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 2/4] net: dsa: sja1105: apply RGMII delays
based on the fixed-link property
On 6/4/2021 7:01 AM, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
>
> The sja1105 driver has an intermediate way of determining whether the
> RGMII delays should be applied by the PHY or by itself: by looking at
> the port role (PHY or MAC). The port can be put in the PHY role either
> explicitly (sja1105,role-phy) or implicitly (fixed-link).
>
> We want to deprecate the sja1105,role-phy property, so all that remains
> is the fixed-link property. Introduce a "fixed_link" array of booleans
> in the driver, and use that to determine whether RGMII delays must be
> applied or not.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
--
Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists