[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3577c361b26e8d70c8bf6dad4029060985f75d3d.camel@microchip.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2021 17:14:04 +0200
From: Steen Hegelund <steen.hegelund@...rochip.com>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Microchip Linux Driver Support <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Madalin Bucur <madalin.bucur@....nxp.com>,
Mark Einon <mark.einon@...il.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
"Simon Horman" <simon.horman@...ronome.com>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Bjarni Jonasson <bjarni.jonasson@...rochip.com>,
Lars Povlsen <lars.povlsen@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 04/10] net: sparx5: add port module support
Hi Russell,
Thanks for your comments,
On Mon, 2021-06-07 at 14:12 +0100, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 02:46:44PM +0200, Steen Hegelund wrote:
> > Hi Russell,
> >
> > Thanks for your comments.
> >
> > On Mon, 2021-06-07 at 10:21 +0100, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> > > It looks to me like the phylink code in your patch series is based on
> > > an older version of phylink and hasn't been updated for the split PCS
> > > support - you seem to be munging the PCS parts in with the MAC
> > > callbacks. If so, please update to the modern way of dealing with this.
> > >
> > > If that isn't the case, please explain why you are not using the split
> > > PCS support.
> >
> > I need to be able to let the user set the speed to get the link up.
> >
> > So far I have only been able to get the user configured speeds via the mac_ops, but if this is
> > also
> > possible via the pcs_ops, there should not anything preventing me from using these ops instead.
> >
> > Will the pcs_ops also support this?
>
> I really don't understand what you're saying here, so I can't answer.
>
> What exactly do you mean "user configured speeds" ? Please give
> examples of exactly what you're wanting to do.
I have added an example to the response in the other email thread.
>
> --
> RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
> FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
--
BR
Steen
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
steen.hegelund@...rochip.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists