[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210609092016.4c43192f@kicinski-fedora-PC1C0HJN.hsd1.ca.comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2021 09:20:16 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>, <cong.wang@...edance.com>,
<xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>, <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
<mkubecek@...e.cz>
Cc: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
<ast@...nel.org>, <daniel@...earbox.net>, <andriin@...com>,
<edumazet@...gle.com>, <ap420073@...il.com>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linuxarm@...neuler.org>, <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
<linux-can@...r.kernel.org>, <jhs@...atatu.com>,
<jiri@...nulli.us>, <andrii@...nel.org>, <kafai@...com>,
<songliubraving@...com>, <yhs@...com>, <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
<bpf@...r.kernel.org>, <jonas.bonn@...rounds.com>,
<pabeni@...hat.com>, <mzhivich@...mai.com>, <johunt@...mai.com>,
<albcamus@...il.com>, <kehuan.feng@...il.com>,
<a.fatoum@...gutronix.de>, <atenart@...nel.org>,
<alexander.duyck@...il.com>, <hdanton@...a.com>, <jgross@...e.com>,
<JKosina@...e.com>, <bjorn@...nel.org>, <alobakin@...me>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/3] Some optimization for lockless qdisc
On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 09:31:39 +0800 Yunsheng Lin wrote:
> On 2021/6/8 20:53, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 11:35:48AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> >> On Thu, 3 Jun 2021 09:47:57 +0800 Yunsheng Lin wrote:
> >>> Patch 1: remove unnecessary seqcount operation.
> >>> Patch 2: implement TCQ_F_CAN_BYPASS.
> >>> Patch 3: remove qdisc->empty.
> >>>
> >>> Performance data for pktgen in queue_xmit mode + dummy netdev
> >>> with pfifo_fast:
> >>>
> >>> threads unpatched patched delta
> >>> 1 2.60Mpps 3.21Mpps +23%
> >>> 2 3.84Mpps 5.56Mpps +44%
> >>> 4 5.52Mpps 5.58Mpps +1%
> >>> 8 2.77Mpps 2.76Mpps -0.3%
> >>> 16 2.24Mpps 2.23Mpps +0.4%
> >>>
> >>> Performance for IP forward testing: 1.05Mpps increases to
> >>> 1.16Mpps, about 10% improvement.
> >>
> >> Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
> >
> > Any idea why these patches are deferred in patchwork?
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/cover/1622684880-39895-1-git-send-email-linyunsheng@huawei.com/
>
> I suppose it is a controversial change, which need more time
> hanging to be reviewed and tested.
That'd be my guess also. A review from area experts would be great,
perhaps from Cong, John, Michal.. If the review doesn't come by
Friday - I'd repost.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists