[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210615232949.2ntjv5kh3g7z2ua2@skbuf>
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 02:29:49 +0300
From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, davem@...emloft.net,
ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, andriin@...com,
edumazet@...gle.com, weiwan@...gle.com, cong.wang@...edance.com,
ap420073@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxarm@...neuler.org,
mkl@...gutronix.de, linux-can@...r.kernel.org, jhs@...atatu.com,
xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, jiri@...nulli.us, andrii@...nel.org,
kafai@...com, songliubraving@...com, yhs@...com,
john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
jonas.bonn@...rounds.com, pabeni@...hat.com, mzhivich@...mai.com,
johunt@...mai.com, albcamus@...il.com, kehuan.feng@...il.com,
a.fatoum@...gutronix.de, atenart@...nel.org,
alexander.duyck@...il.com, hdanton@...a.com, jgross@...e.com,
JKosina@...e.com, mkubecek@...e.cz, bjorn@...nel.org,
alobakin@...me
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/3] Some optimization for lockless qdisc
On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 09:31:39AM +0800, Yunsheng Lin wrote:
> By the way, I did not pick up your "Tested-by" from previous
> RFC version because there is some change between those version
> that deserves a retesting. So it would be good to have a
> "Tested-by" from you after confirming no out of order happening
> for this version, thanks.
Tested-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com> # flexcan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists