netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 00/10] DSA tagging driver for NXP SJA1110

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210611000915.ufp2db4qtv2vsjqb@skbuf>
Date:   Fri, 11 Jun 2021 03:09:15 +0300
From:   Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     kuba@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        andrew@...n.ch, vivien.didelot@...il.com, richardcochran@...il.com,
        vladimir.oltean@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 00/10] DSA tagging driver for NXP SJA1110

On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 04:50:50PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> 
> Patch 9 no longer applies cleanly.
> 
> Thank you.

Ah, that is because I also have the "Port the SJA1105 DSA driver to XPCS"
patches in my tree, and they are photobombing this series. With git rebase -i
they apply both ways, but git rebase has more context when applying than
git am, so I'm not in fact surprised that it fails, now that you mention it.

I could probably dodge that by moving some lines of code here and there
so they aren't near the XPCS changes, but I think I'll choose to not do
that, and instead let the people breathe a little, maybe take a look at
the patches as they are - if they want to apply them to a tree, that's
possible as well, sure, just apply the other series first - and then
resend tomorrow, or after the other patches are accepted.

Thanks and sorry for the trouble.