lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 11 Jun 2021 05:26:01 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Cc:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, kuba@...nel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        vivien.didelot@...il.com, richardcochran@...il.com,
        vladimir.oltean@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 00/10] DSA tagging driver for NXP SJA1110

On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 03:09:15AM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 04:50:50PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> > 
> > Patch 9 no longer applies cleanly.
> > 
> > Thank you.
> 
> Ah, that is because I also have the "Port the SJA1105 DSA driver to XPCS"
> patches in my tree, and they are photobombing this series. With git rebase -i
> they apply both ways, but git rebase has more context when applying than
> git am, so I'm not in fact surprised that it fails, now that you mention it.
> 
> I could probably dodge that by moving some lines of code here and there
> so they aren't near the XPCS changes

Hi Vladimir

git am is very pedantic. It does not use fuzz. So just moving lines
within the same line is unlikely to work, you need to make the changes
in non intersecting sets of files.

Your best bet is to be patient and wait for one patchset to get
merged, and then submit the second patchset.

	Andrew

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ