netdev - [PATCH v3 net-next 09/13] net: pcs: xpcs: export xpcs_do_config and xpcs_link

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210611200531.2384819-10-olteanv@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 11 Jun 2021 23:05:27 +0300
From:   Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Wong Vee Khee <vee.khee.wong@...ux.intel.com>,
        Ong Boon Leong <boon.leong.ong@...el.com>,
        Michael Sit Wei Hong <michael.wei.hong.sit@...el.com>,
        Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
        Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
        Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
        Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>,
        Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
        Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 net-next 09/13] net: pcs: xpcs: export xpcs_do_config and xpcs_link_up

From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>

The sja1105 hardware has a quirk in that some changes require a switch
reset, which loses all configuration. When the reset is initiated,
everything needs to be reprogrammed, including the MACs and the PCS.
This is currently done in sja1105_static_config_reload() - we manually
call sja1105_adjust_port_config(), sja1105_sgmii_pcs_config() and
sja1105_sgmii_pcs_force_speed() which are all internal functions.

There is a desire for sja1105 to use the common xpcs driver, and that
means that the equivalents of those functions, xpcs_do_config() and
xpcs_link_up() respectively, will no longer be local functions.

Forcing phylink to retrigger a resolve somehow, say by doing dev_close()
followed by dev_open() is not really an option, because the CPU port
might have a PCS as well, and there is no net device which we can close
and reopen for that. Additionally, the dev_close/dev_open sequence might
force a renegotiation of the copper-side link for SGMII ports connected
to a PHY, and this is undesirable as well, because the switch reset is
much quicker than a PHY autoneg, so we would have a lot more downtime.

The only solution I see is for the sja1105 driver to keep doing what
it's doing, and that means we need to export the equivalents from xpcs
for sja1105_sgmii_pcs_config and sja1105_sgmii_pcs_force_speed, and call
them directly in sja1105_static_config_reload(). This will be done
during the conversion patch.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
---
v2->v3: none
v1->v2: none

 drivers/net/pcs/pcs-xpcs.c   | 10 ++++++----
 include/linux/pcs/pcs-xpcs.h |  4 ++++
 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/pcs/pcs-xpcs.c b/drivers/net/pcs/pcs-xpcs.c
index b66e46fc88dc..63fda3fc40aa 100644
--- a/drivers/net/pcs/pcs-xpcs.c
+++ b/drivers/net/pcs/pcs-xpcs.c
@@ -757,8 +757,8 @@ static int xpcs_config_2500basex(struct dw_xpcs *xpcs)
 	return xpcs_write(xpcs, MDIO_MMD_VEND2, DW_VR_MII_MMD_CTRL, ret);
 }
 
-static int xpcs_do_config(struct dw_xpcs *xpcs, phy_interface_t interface,
-			  unsigned int mode)
+int xpcs_do_config(struct dw_xpcs *xpcs, phy_interface_t interface,
+		   unsigned int mode)
 {
 	const struct xpcs_compat *compat;
 	int ret;
@@ -797,6 +797,7 @@ static int xpcs_do_config(struct dw_xpcs *xpcs, phy_interface_t interface,
 
 	return 0;
 }
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xpcs_do_config);
 
 static int xpcs_config(struct phylink_pcs *pcs, unsigned int mode,
 		       phy_interface_t interface,
@@ -945,8 +946,8 @@ static void xpcs_link_up_sgmii(struct dw_xpcs *xpcs, unsigned int mode,
 		pr_err("%s: xpcs_write returned %pe\n", __func__, ERR_PTR(ret));
 }
 
-static void xpcs_link_up(struct phylink_pcs *pcs, unsigned int mode,
-			 phy_interface_t interface, int speed, int duplex)
+void xpcs_link_up(struct phylink_pcs *pcs, unsigned int mode,
+		  phy_interface_t interface, int speed, int duplex)
 {
 	struct dw_xpcs *xpcs = phylink_pcs_to_xpcs(pcs);
 
@@ -955,6 +956,7 @@ static void xpcs_link_up(struct phylink_pcs *pcs, unsigned int mode,
 	if (interface == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_SGMII)
 		return xpcs_link_up_sgmii(xpcs, mode, speed, duplex);
 }
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xpcs_link_up);
 
 static u32 xpcs_get_id(struct dw_xpcs *xpcs)
 {
diff --git a/include/linux/pcs/pcs-xpcs.h b/include/linux/pcs/pcs-xpcs.h
index dae7dd8ac683..add077a81b21 100644
--- a/include/linux/pcs/pcs-xpcs.h
+++ b/include/linux/pcs/pcs-xpcs.h
@@ -27,6 +27,10 @@ struct dw_xpcs {
 };
 
 int xpcs_get_an_mode(struct dw_xpcs *xpcs, phy_interface_t interface);
+void xpcs_link_up(struct phylink_pcs *pcs, unsigned int mode,
+		  phy_interface_t interface, int speed, int duplex);
+int xpcs_do_config(struct dw_xpcs *xpcs, phy_interface_t interface,
+		   unsigned int mode);
 void xpcs_validate(struct dw_xpcs *xpcs, unsigned long *supported,
 		   struct phylink_link_state *state);
 int xpcs_config_eee(struct dw_xpcs *xpcs, int mult_fact_100ns,
-- 
2.25.1