[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210614130530.7a422f27@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2021 13:05:30 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no>,
Kristian Evensen <kristian.evensen@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, subashab@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] qmi_wwan: Clone the skb when in pass-through mode
On Mon, 14 Jun 2021 16:45:55 +0200 Bjørn Mork wrote:
> Kristian Evensen <kristian.evensen@...il.com> writes:
>
> > The skb that we pass to the rmnet driver is owned by usbnet and is freed
> > soon after the rx_fixup() callback is called (in usbnet_bh()). There is
> > no guarantee that rmnet is done handling the skb before it is freed. We
> > should clone the skb before we call netif_rx() to prevent use-after-free
> > and misc. kernel oops.
> >
> > Fixes: 59e139cf0b32 ("net: qmi_wwan: Add pass through mode")
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kristian Evensen <kristian.evensen@...il.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/usb/qmi_wwan.c | 4 ++++
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/usb/qmi_wwan.c b/drivers/net/usb/qmi_wwan.c
> > index db8d3a4f2678..5ac307eb0bfd 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/usb/qmi_wwan.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/usb/qmi_wwan.c
> > @@ -620,6 +620,10 @@ static int qmi_wwan_rx_fixup(struct usbnet *dev, struct sk_buff *skb)
> > return qmimux_rx_fixup(dev, skb);
> >
> > if (info->flags & QMI_WWAN_FLAG_PASS_THROUGH) {
> > + skb = skb_clone(skb, GFP_ATOMIC);
> > + if (!skb)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > skb->protocol = htons(ETH_P_MAP);
> > return (netif_rx(skb) == NET_RX_SUCCESS);
> > }
>
> Thanks for pointing this out. But it still looks strange to me. Why do
> we call netif_rx(skb) here instead of just returning 1 and leave that
> for usbnet_skb_return()? With cloning we end up doing eth_type_trans()
> on the duplicate - is that wise?
Agreed on the cloning being a strange solution. Kristian, were you able
to reproduce the problem on upstream kernels?
It does look pretty strange that qmimux_rx_fixup() copies out all
packets and receives them, and then let's usbnet to process the
multi-frame skb without even fulling off the qmimux_hdr. I'm probably
missing something.. otherwise sth like FLAG_MULTI_PACKET may be in
order?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists