lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD-N9QW6LhRO+D-rr4xCCuq+m=jtD7LS_+GDVs9DkHe5paeSOg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 15 Jun 2021 18:24:17 +0800
From:   Dongliang Mu <mudongliangabcd@...il.com>
To:     Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc:     Steve Glendinning <steve.glendinning@...well.net>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Pavel Skripkin <paskripkin@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: usb: fix possible use-after-free in smsc75xx_bind

On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 6:10 PM Dongliang Mu <mudongliangabcd@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 5:44 PM Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 03:56:32PM +0800, Dongliang Mu wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 3:38 PM Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 11:37:12PM +0800, Dongliang Mu wrote:
> > > > > The commit 46a8b29c6306 ("net: usb: fix memory leak in smsc75xx_bind")
> > > > > fails to clean up the work scheduled in smsc75xx_reset->
> > > > > smsc75xx_set_multicast, which leads to use-after-free if the work is
> > > > > scheduled to start after the deallocation. In addition, this patch also
> > > > > removes one dangling pointer - dev->data[0].
> > > > >
> > > > > This patch calls cancel_work_sync to cancel the schedule work and set
> > > > > the dangling pointer to NULL.
> > > > >
> > > > > Fixes: 46a8b29c6306 ("net: usb: fix memory leak in smsc75xx_bind")
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Dongliang Mu <mudongliangabcd@...il.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >  drivers/net/usb/smsc75xx.c | 3 +++
> > > > >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/usb/smsc75xx.c b/drivers/net/usb/smsc75xx.c
> > > > > index b286993da67c..f81740fcc8d5 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/net/usb/smsc75xx.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/net/usb/smsc75xx.c
> > > > > @@ -1504,7 +1504,10 @@ static int smsc75xx_bind(struct usbnet *dev, struct usb_interface *intf)
> > > > >       return 0;
> > > > >
> > > > >  err:
> > > > > +     cancel_work_sync(&pdata->set_multicast);
> > > > >       kfree(pdata);
> > > > > +     pdata = NULL;
> > > >
> > > > Why do you have to set pdata to NULL afterward?
> > > >
> > >
> > > It does not have to. pdata will be useless when the function exits. I
> > > just referred to the implementation of smsc75xx_unbind.
> >
> > It's wrong there too :)
>
> /: I will fix such two sites in the v2 patch.

Hi gregkh,

If the schedule_work is not invoked, can I call
``cancel_work_sync(&pdata->set_multicast)''? If not, is there any
method to verify if the schedule_work is already called?

Best regards,
Dongliang Mu

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ