[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAADnVQKi_3i6bOrYiDTLXwxhQnHDBJvHankqndzNP7eCJr27pQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2021 09:23:10 -0700
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@...il.com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...dia.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Joe Stringer <joe@...ium.io>,
Quentin Monnet <quentin@...valent.com>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <mleitner@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC bpf-next 0/7] Add bpf_link based TC-BPF API
On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 7:50 AM Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com> wrote:
>
> On 2021-06-18 10:38 a.m., Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 4:40 AM Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> We are going to present some of the challenges we faced in a subset
> >> of our work in an approach to replace iptables at netdev 0x15
> >> (hopefully we get accepted).
> >
> > Jamal,
> > please stop using netdev@...r mailing list to promote a conference
> > that does NOT represent the netdev kernel community.
> >
> > Slides shown at that conference is a non-event as far as this discussion goes.
>
> Alexei,
> Tame the aggression, would you please?
> You have no right to make claims as to who represents the community.
> Absolutely none. So get off that high horse.
>
> I only mentioned the slides because it will be a good spot when
> done which captures the issues. As i mentioned in i actually did
> send some email (some Cced to you) but got no response.
> I dont mind having a discussion but you have to be willing to
> listen as well.
You've side tracked technical discussion to promote your own conference.
That's not acceptable. Please use other forums for marketing.
This mailing list is for technical discussions.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists