netdev - Re: [PATCH RFC bpf-next 0/7] Add bpf

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d2a23b1b-aa2e-ee55-fff7-89a59ea57c8e@mojatatu.com>
Date:   Fri, 18 Jun 2021 12:41:58 -0400
From:   Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
To:     Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Cc:     Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@...il.com>,
        Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
        bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...dia.com>,
        Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Joe Stringer <joe@...ium.io>,
        Quentin Monnet <quentin@...valent.com>,
        Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
        Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>,
        Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <mleitner@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC bpf-next 0/7] Add bpf_link based TC-BPF API

On 2021-06-18 12:23 p.m., Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 7:50 AM Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com> wrote:
>

[..]
>> Alexei,
>> Tame the aggression, would you please?
>> You have no right to make claims as to who represents the community.
>> Absolutely none. So get off that high horse.
>>
>> I only mentioned the slides because it will be a good spot when
>> done which captures the issues. As i mentioned in i actually did
>> send some email (some Cced to you) but got no response.
>> I dont mind having a discussion but you have to be willing to
>> listen as well.
> 
> You've side tracked technical discussion to promote your own conference.
> That's not acceptable. Please use other forums for marketing.
 >
> This mailing list is for technical discussions.

I just made a statement in passing and you took it to a
tangent. If you are so righteous, why didnt you just stick
to making technical comments?
Stop making bold statements and then playing the victim.

cheers,
jamal