[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <60d49690a87ae_2e84a2082c@john-XPS-13-9370.notmuch>
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 07:28:32 -0700
From: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
To: Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@...hat.com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
Cc: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, lorenzo.bianconi@...hat.com,
davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, ast@...nel.org,
daniel@...earbox.net, shayagr@...zon.com, sameehj@...zon.com,
dsahern@...nel.org, brouer@...hat.com, jasowang@...hat.com,
alexander.duyck@...il.com, saeed@...nel.org,
maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com, magnus.karlsson@...el.com,
tirthendu.sarkar@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 bpf-next 10/14] bpf: add multi-buffer support to xdp
copy helpers
Eelco Chaudron wrote:
>
>
> On 23 Jun 2021, at 1:49, John Fastabend wrote:
>
> > Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> >> From: Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@...hat.com>
> >>
> >> This patch adds support for multi-buffer for the following helpers:
> >> - bpf_xdp_output()
> >> - bpf_perf_event_output()
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@...hat.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>
> >> ---
> >
> > Ah ok so at least xdp_output will work with all bytes. But this is
> > getting close to having access into the frags so I think doing
> > the last bit shouldn't be too hard?
>
>
> Guess you are talking about multi-buffer access in the XDP program?
>
> I did suggest an API a while back, https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/FD3E6E08-DE78-4FBA-96F6-646C93E88631@redhat.com/ but I had/have not time to work on it. Guess the difficult part is to convince the verifier to allow the data to be accessed.
Ah great I think we had the same idea I called it xdp_pull_data()
though.
Whats the complication though it looks like it can be done by simply
moving the data and data_end pointers around then marking them
invalidated. This way the verifier knows the program needs to
rewrite them. I can probably look more into next week.
>From my first glance it looks relatively straight forward to do
now. I really would like to avoid yet another iteration of
programs features I have to discover and somehow work around
if we can get the helper into this series. If you really don't
have time I can probably take a look early next week on an
RFC for something like above helper.
.John
Powered by blists - more mailing lists