[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dbef867f-6333-d1f7-0f33-98582af7bdf8@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 22:36:50 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: M Chetan Kumar <m.chetan.kumar@...ux.intel.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kuba@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net, johannes@...solutions.net,
krishna.c.sudi@...el.com, linuxwwan@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] net: wwan: iosm: fix netdev tx stats
On 6/30/21 8:27 PM, M Chetan Kumar wrote:
> Update tx stats on successful packet consume, drop.
>
> Signed-off-by: M Chetan Kumar <m.chetan.kumar@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/wwan/iosm/iosm_ipc_wwan.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wwan/iosm/iosm_ipc_wwan.c b/drivers/net/wwan/iosm/iosm_ipc_wwan.c
> index 84e37c4b0f74..561944a33725 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wwan/iosm/iosm_ipc_wwan.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wwan/iosm/iosm_ipc_wwan.c
> @@ -123,6 +123,8 @@ static int ipc_wwan_link_transmit(struct sk_buff *skb,
>
> /* Return code of zero is success */
> if (ret == 0) {
> + netdev->stats.tx_packets++;
> + netdev->stats.tx_bytes += skb->len;
What makes you think skb has not been consumed already ?
It seems clear it has been given, this thread can not expect skb has not been mangled/freed.
skb->len might now contain garbage, or even crash the kernel under appropriate debug features.
> ret = NETDEV_TX_OK;
> } else if (ret == -EBUSY) {
> ret = NETDEV_TX_BUSY;
> @@ -140,7 +142,8 @@ static int ipc_wwan_link_transmit(struct sk_buff *skb,
> ret);
>
> dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
> - return ret;
> + netdev->stats.tx_dropped++;
> + return NETDEV_TX_OK;
> }
>
> /* Ops structure for wwan net link */
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists