[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210715141937.5356-1-rocco.yue@mediatek.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2021 22:19:37 +0800
From: Rocco Yue <rocco.yue@...iatek.com>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
CC: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>, <wsd_upstream@...iatek.com>,
<rocco.yue@...il.com>, Rocco Yue <rocco.yue@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: ipv6: remove unused local variable
On Thu, 2021-07-15 at 08:16 -0600, David Ahern wrote:
> On 7/14/21 10:20 PM, Rocco Yue wrote:
>> The local variable "struct net *net" in the two functions of
>> inet6_rtm_getaddr() and inet6_dump_addr() are actually useless,
>> so remove them.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rocco Yue <rocco.yue@...iatek.com>
>> ---
>> net/ipv6/addrconf.c | 6 ++----
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>
> a v2 with no changelog. From what I can tell the only difference is
> "net: " in the Subject line which is not what I said in the last email.
>
> Let me try again: There are 2 trees - net for bug fixes and net-next for
> development (anything that is not a bug fix). Each patch should specify
> which tree the patch is for by putting 'net' or 'net-next' in the
> brackets ([]). This is a cleanup not a bug fix, so this patch should be:
>
> [PATCH net-next] ipv6: remove unused local variable
>
> and really that should be
>
> [PATCH net-next] ipv6: remove unnecessary local variable
>
> If you send more versions of a patch always put a changelog - a summary
> of what is different in the current patch versus the previous ones.
>
> No need to send another version of this patch unless you get a comment
> requesting change, or the maintainers ask for a re-send.
>
> Reviewed-by: David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>
Hi David,
Thanks for your detailed explanation,
I am appreciated that you shared these valureable advices for me.
They are important for my furture upstream work.
I will re-send it :)
Sincerely,
Rocco
Powered by blists - more mailing lists