[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d6101597-975c-8606-2dc0-eae51cbbe42f@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2021 18:56:58 +0800
From: Xianting Tian <xianting.tian@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>
Cc: sgarzare@...hat.com, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
jasowang@...hat.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] vsock/virtio: set vsock frontend ready in
virtio_vsock_probe()
OK,
thanks
在 2021/7/20 下午6:23, Stefan Hajnoczi 写道:
> On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 03:13:37PM +0800, Xianting Tian wrote:
>> Add the missed virtio_device_ready() to set vsock frontend ready.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Xianting Tian <xianting.tian@...ux.alibaba.com>
>> ---
>> net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c | 2 ++
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> Please include a changelog when you send v2, v3, etc patches.
>
>> diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
>> index e0c2c992a..dc834b8fd 100644
>> --- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
>> +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
>> @@ -639,6 +639,8 @@ static int virtio_vsock_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
>>
>> mutex_unlock(&the_virtio_vsock_mutex);
>>
>> + virtio_device_ready(vdev);
> Why is this patch necessary?
>
> The core virtio_dev_probe() code already calls virtio_device_ready for
> us:
>
> static int virtio_dev_probe(struct device *_d)
> {
> ...
> err = drv->probe(dev);
> if (err)
> goto err;
>
> /* If probe didn't do it, mark device DRIVER_OK ourselves. */
> if (!(dev->config->get_status(dev) & VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK))
> virtio_device_ready(dev);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists