netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 5/5] igc: Export LEDs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0bf24356-0090-a2d7-cd77-40cf04e05097@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 21 Jul 2021 18:02:57 +0200
From:   Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:     Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
        Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
        kuba@...nel.org, Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@...utronix.de>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, sasha.neftin@...el.com,
        vitaly.lifshits@...el.com, vinicius.gomes@...el.com,
        Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
        Dvora Fuxbrumer <dvorax.fuxbrumer@...ux.intel.com>,
        "linux-leds@...r.kernel.org" <linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 5/5] igc: Export LEDs

On 21.07.2021 16:35, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> Thanks for the hint, Andrew. If I make &netdev->dev the parent,
>> then I get:
>>
>> ll /sys/class/leds/
>> total 0
>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Jul 20 21:37 led0 -> ../../devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.0/0000:03:00.0/net/enp3s0/led0
>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Jul 20 21:37 led1 -> ../../devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.0/0000:03:00.0/net/enp3s0/led1
>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Jul 20 21:37 led2 -> ../../devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.0/0000:03:00.0/net/enp3s0/led2
>>
>> Now the (linked) LED devices are under /sys/class/net/<ifname>, but still
>> the primary LED devices are under /sys/class/leds and their names have
>> to be unique therefore. The LED subsystem takes care of unique names,
>> but in case of a second network interface the LED device name suddenly
>> would be led0_1 (IIRC). So the names wouldn't be predictable, and I think
>> that's not what we want.
> 
> We need input from the LED maintainers, but do we actually need the
> symbolic links in /sys/class/leds/? For this specific use case, not
> generally. Allow an LED to opt out of the /sys/class/leds symlink.
> 

The links are created here:

led_classdev_register_ext()
-> device_create_with_groups()
   -> device_add()
      -> device_add_class_symlinks()

So it seems we'd need an extension to the device core to support
class link opt-out.

> If we could drop those, we can relax the naming requirements so that
> the names is unique to a parent device, not globally unique.
> 
>     Andrew
> 
Heiner