[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a1iOn4pzHXmd+NQnXpmqV9ebF5TdPb7_yUEutkeOgCGtg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 10:49:21 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
To: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Karsten Graul <kgraul@...ux.ibm.com>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 16/31] qeth: use ndo_siocdevprivate
On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 8:06 AM Julian Wiedmann <jwi@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> On 20.07.21 17:46, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> >
> > qeth has both standard MII ioctls and custom SIOCDEVPRIVATE ones,
> > all of which work correctly with compat user space.
> >
> > Move the private ones over to the new ndo_siocdevprivate callback.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> > ---
>
> your get_maintainers scripting seems broken, adding the usual suspects.
Right, I ran the wrong script for sending.
> > -int qeth_do_ioctl(struct net_device *dev, struct ifreq *rq, int cmd)
> > +int qeth_siocdevprivate(struct net_device *dev, struct ifreq *rq, void __user *data, int cmd)
> > {
> > struct qeth_card *card = dev->ml_priv;
> > - struct mii_ioctl_data *mii_data;
> > int rc = 0;
> >
> > switch (cmd) {
> > case SIOC_QETH_ADP_SET_SNMP_CONTROL:
> > - rc = qeth_snmp_command(card, rq->ifr_ifru.ifru_data);
> > + rc = qeth_snmp_command(card, data);
> > break;
> > case SIOC_QETH_GET_CARD_TYPE:
> > if ((IS_OSD(card) || IS_OSM(card) || IS_OSX(card)) &&
> > !IS_VM_NIC(card))
> > return 1;
> > return 0;
> > + case SIOC_QETH_QUERY_OAT:
> > + rc = qeth_query_oat_command(card, data);
> > + break;
> > + default:
> > + if (card->discipline->do_ioctl)
> > + rc = card->discipline->do_ioctl(dev, rq, data, cmd);
> > + else
> > + rc = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > + }
> > + if (rc)
> > + QETH_CARD_TEXT_(card, 2, "ioce%x", rc);
> > + return rc;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(qeth_siocdevprivate);
> > +
>
> Looks like you missed to wire this up in our netdev_ops structs.
Fixed now, thanks! I've gone through the other patches as well
to see if I made the same mistake elsewhere, but it appears this
one was the only time here.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists