lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 23 Jul 2021 12:38:27 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
Cc:     Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>, tj@...nel.org,
        shuah@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, rafael@...nel.org,
        davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, ast@...nel.org,
        andriin@...com, daniel@...earbox.net, atenart@...nel.org,
        alobakin@...me, weiwan@...gle.com, ap420073@...il.com,
        jeyu@...nel.org, ngupta@...are.org,
        sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com, minchan@...nel.org,
        axboe@...nel.dk, mbenes@...e.com, jpoimboe@...hat.com,
        tglx@...utronix.de, keescook@...omium.org, jikos@...nel.org,
        rostedt@...dmis.org, peterz@...radead.org,
        linux-block@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] selftests: add tests_sysfs module

On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 03:34:49PM -0700, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> kunit relies on UML and UML is a simple one core architecture, to start
> with.

I thought the UML requirement was long gone, are you sure it is still
present?

> This means I cannot run tests for multicore with it, which is
> where many races do happen! Yes, you can run kunit on other
> architectures, but all that is new.

What do you mean by "new"?  It should work today, in today's kernel
tree, right?

> In this case kunit is not ideal given I want to mimic something in
> userspace interaction, and expose races through error injection and
> if we can use as many cores to busy races out.

Can you not do that with kunit?  If not, why not?

thanks,

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists