[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YPqcIzKpEXftpZM8@kroah.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2021 12:38:27 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
Cc: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>, tj@...nel.org,
shuah@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, rafael@...nel.org,
davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, ast@...nel.org,
andriin@...com, daniel@...earbox.net, atenart@...nel.org,
alobakin@...me, weiwan@...gle.com, ap420073@...il.com,
jeyu@...nel.org, ngupta@...are.org,
sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com, minchan@...nel.org,
axboe@...nel.dk, mbenes@...e.com, jpoimboe@...hat.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, keescook@...omium.org, jikos@...nel.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, peterz@...radead.org,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] selftests: add tests_sysfs module
On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 03:34:49PM -0700, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> kunit relies on UML and UML is a simple one core architecture, to start
> with.
I thought the UML requirement was long gone, are you sure it is still
present?
> This means I cannot run tests for multicore with it, which is
> where many races do happen! Yes, you can run kunit on other
> architectures, but all that is new.
What do you mean by "new"? It should work today, in today's kernel
tree, right?
> In this case kunit is not ideal given I want to mimic something in
> userspace interaction, and expose races through error injection and
> if we can use as many cores to busy races out.
Can you not do that with kunit? If not, why not?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists