netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v2 4/4] net: marvell: prestera: Offload FLOW_ACTION

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YQgN1djql6wOk8dc@shredder>
Date:   Mon, 2 Aug 2021 18:23:01 +0300
From:   Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>
To:     Vadym Kochan <vadym.kochan@...ision.eu>
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
        Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
        Serhiy Boiko <serhiy.boiko@...ision.eu>,
        Volodymyr Mytnyk <volodymyr.mytnyk@...ision.eu>,
        Taras Chornyi <taras.chornyi@...ision.eu>,
        Taras Chornyi <tchornyi@...vell.com>,
        Mickey Rachamim <mickeyr@...vell.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Volodymyr Mytnyk <vmytnyk@...vell.com>,
        Vadym Kochan <vkochan@...vell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 4/4] net: marvell: prestera: Offload
 FLOW_ACTION_POLICE

On Mon, Aug 02, 2021 at 05:08:49PM +0300, Vadym Kochan wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/prestera/prestera_flower.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/prestera/prestera_flower.c
> index e571ba09ec08..76f30856ac98 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/prestera/prestera_flower.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/prestera/prestera_flower.c
> @@ -5,6 +5,8 @@
>  #include "prestera_acl.h"
>  #include "prestera_flower.h"
>  
> +#define PRESTERA_HW_TC_NUM	8
> +
>  static int prestera_flower_parse_actions(struct prestera_flow_block *block,
>  					 struct prestera_acl_rule *rule,
>  					 struct flow_action *flow_action,
> @@ -30,6 +32,11 @@ static int prestera_flower_parse_actions(struct prestera_flow_block *block,
>  		case FLOW_ACTION_TRAP:
>  			a_entry.id = PRESTERA_ACL_RULE_ACTION_TRAP;
>  			break;
> +		case FLOW_ACTION_POLICE:
> +			a_entry.id = PRESTERA_ACL_RULE_ACTION_POLICE;
> +			a_entry.police.rate = act->police.rate_bytes_ps;
> +			a_entry.police.burst = act->police.burst;

If packet rate based policing is not supported, an error should be
returned here with extack.

It seems the implementation assumes that each rule has a different
policer, so an error should be returned in case the same policer is
shared between different rules.

> +			break;
>  		default:
>  			NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Unsupported action");
>  			pr_err("Unsupported action\n");
> @@ -110,6 +117,17 @@ static int prestera_flower_parse(struct prestera_flow_block *block,
>  		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>  	}
>  
> +	if (f->classid) {
> +		int hw_tc = __tc_classid_to_hwtc(PRESTERA_HW_TC_NUM, f->classid);
> +
> +		if (hw_tc < 0) {
> +			NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(f->common.extack, "Unsupported HW TC");
> +			return hw_tc;
> +		}
> +
> +		prestera_acl_rule_hw_tc_set(rule, hw_tc);
> +	}

Not sure what this is. Can you show a command line example of how this
is used?

What about visibility regarding number of packets that were dropped by
the policer?