lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 2 Aug 2021 18:42:28 +0200
From:   Heiner Kallweit <>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <>
Cc:     David Miller <>,
        "" <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/4] ethtool: runtime-resume netdev parent before
 ethtool ops

On 02.08.2021 16:15, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Aug 2021 18:25:52 +0200 Heiner Kallweit wrote:
>> Patchwork is showing the following warning for all patches in the series.
>> netdev/cc_maintainers	warning	7 maintainers not CCed:
>> This seems to be a false positive, e.g. address
>> doesn't exist at all in MAINTAINERS file.
> It gets the list from the get_maintainers script. It's one of the less
> reliable tests, but I feel like efforts should be made primarily
> towards improving get_maintainers rather than improving the test itself.
When running for any of the patches in the series
I don't get these addresses. I run get_maintainers w/o options, maybe
you set some special option? That's what I get when running get_maintainers:

"David S. Miller" <> (maintainer:NETWORKING [GENERAL])
Jakub Kicinski <> (maintainer:NETWORKING [GENERAL])
Stephen Rothwell <> (commit_signer:1/2=50%,authored:1/2=50%,added_lines:3144/3159=100%)
Heiner Kallweit <> (commit_signer:1/2=50%,authored:1/2=50%,removed_lines:3/3=100%) (open list:NETWORKING [GENERAL]) (open list)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists