netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 0/4] ethtool: runtime-resume netdev parent before ethtool ops

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 2 Aug 2021 07:15:31 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
Cc:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/4] ethtool: runtime-resume netdev parent
 before ethtool ops

On Sun, 1 Aug 2021 18:25:52 +0200 Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> Patchwork is showing the following warning for all patches in the series.
> 
> netdev/cc_maintainers	warning	7 maintainers not CCed: ecree@...arflare.com andrew@...n.ch magnus.karlsson@...el.com danieller@...dia.com arnd@...db.de irusskikh@...vell.com alexanderduyck@...com
> 
> This seems to be a false positive, e.g. address ecree@...arflare.com
> doesn't exist at all in MAINTAINERS file.

It gets the list from the get_maintainers script. It's one of the less
reliable tests, but I feel like efforts should be made primarily
towards improving get_maintainers rather than improving the test itself.