[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YQfk9G+k0Tj8ihyu@8bytes.org>
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2021 14:28:36 +0200
From: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
To: Tianyu Lan <ltykernel@...il.com>
Cc: kys@...rosoft.com, haiyangz@...rosoft.com, sthemmin@...rosoft.com,
wei.liu@...nel.org, decui@...rosoft.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, luto@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
konrad.wilk@...cle.com, boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com,
jgross@...e.com, sstabellini@...nel.org, will@...nel.org,
davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, jejb@...ux.ibm.com,
martin.petersen@...cle.com, arnd@...db.de, hch@....de,
m.szyprowski@...sung.com, robin.murphy@....com,
thomas.lendacky@....com, brijesh.singh@....com, ardb@...nel.org,
Tianyu.Lan@...rosoft.com, rientjes@...gle.com,
martin.b.radev@...il.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
rppt@...nel.org, kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com,
aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com, krish.sadhukhan@...cle.com,
saravanand@...com, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
pgonda@...gle.com, david@...hat.com, keescook@...omium.org,
hannes@...xchg.org, sfr@...b.auug.org.au,
michael.h.kelley@...rosoft.com, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, vkuznets@...hat.com, anparri@...rosoft.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/13] HV: Add Write/Read MSR registers via ghcb page
On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 10:52:20AM -0400, Tianyu Lan wrote:
> +void hv_ghcb_msr_write(u64 msr, u64 value)
> +{
> + union hv_ghcb *hv_ghcb;
> + void **ghcb_base;
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + if (!ms_hyperv.ghcb_base)
> + return;
> +
> + WARN_ON(in_nmi());
> +
> + local_irq_save(flags);
> + ghcb_base = (void **)this_cpu_ptr(ms_hyperv.ghcb_base);
> + hv_ghcb = (union hv_ghcb *)*ghcb_base;
> + if (!hv_ghcb) {
> + local_irq_restore(flags);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + memset(hv_ghcb, 0x00, HV_HYP_PAGE_SIZE);
Do you really need to zero out the whole 4k? The validation bitmap
should be enough, there are no secrets on the page anyway.
Same in hv_ghcb_msr_read().
> +enum es_result sev_es_ghcb_hv_call(struct ghcb *ghcb,
> + struct es_em_ctxt *ctxt,
> + u64 exit_code, u64 exit_info_1,
> + u64 exit_info_2)
> {
> enum es_result ret;
>
> @@ -109,7 +109,16 @@ static enum es_result sev_es_ghcb_hv_call(struct ghcb *ghcb,
> ghcb_set_sw_exit_info_1(ghcb, exit_info_1);
> ghcb_set_sw_exit_info_2(ghcb, exit_info_2);
>
> - sev_es_wr_ghcb_msr(__pa(ghcb));
> + /*
> + * Hyper-V runs paravisor with SEV. Ghcb page is allocated by
> + * paravisor and not needs to be updated in the Linux guest.
> + * Otherwise, the ghcb page's PA reported by paravisor is above
> + * VTOM. Hyper-V use this function with NULL for ctxt point and
> + * skip setting ghcb page in such case.
> + */
> + if (ctxt)
> + sev_es_wr_ghcb_msr(__pa(ghcb));
No, do not make this function work with ctxt==NULL. Instead, factor out
a helper function which contains what Hyper-V needs and use that in
sev_es_ghcb_hv_call() and Hyper-V code.
> +union hv_ghcb {
> + struct ghcb ghcb;
> +} __packed __aligned(PAGE_SIZE);
I am curious what this will end up being good for.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists