[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e8918379-5c59-c718-3cec-27da931660e9@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2021 20:35:10 +0800
From: Tianyu Lan <ltykernel@...il.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
Cc: kys@...rosoft.com, haiyangz@...rosoft.com, sthemmin@...rosoft.com,
wei.liu@...nel.org, decui@...rosoft.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, luto@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
konrad.wilk@...cle.com, boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com,
jgross@...e.com, sstabellini@...nel.org, will@...nel.org,
davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, jejb@...ux.ibm.com,
martin.petersen@...cle.com, arnd@...db.de, hch@....de,
m.szyprowski@...sung.com, robin.murphy@....com,
thomas.lendacky@....com, brijesh.singh@....com, ardb@...nel.org,
Tianyu.Lan@...rosoft.com, rientjes@...gle.com,
martin.b.radev@...il.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
rppt@...nel.org, kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com,
aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com, krish.sadhukhan@...cle.com,
saravanand@...com, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
pgonda@...gle.com, david@...hat.com, keescook@...omium.org,
hannes@...xchg.org, sfr@...b.auug.org.au,
michael.h.kelley@...rosoft.com, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, vkuznets@...hat.com, anparri@...rosoft.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/13] x86/HV: Initialize GHCB page in Isolation VM
Hi Joerg:
Thanks for your review.
On 8/2/2021 7:53 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 10:52:16AM -0400, Tianyu Lan wrote:
>> +static int hyperv_init_ghcb(void)
>> +{
>> + u64 ghcb_gpa;
>> + void *ghcb_va;
>> + void **ghcb_base;
>> +
>> + if (!ms_hyperv.ghcb_base)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + rdmsrl(MSR_AMD64_SEV_ES_GHCB, ghcb_gpa);
>> + ghcb_va = memremap(ghcb_gpa, HV_HYP_PAGE_SIZE, MEMREMAP_WB);
>
> This deserves a comment. As I understand it, the GHCB pa is set by
> Hyper-V or the paravisor, so the page does not need to be allocated by
> Linux.
> And it is not mapped unencrypted because the GHCB page is allocated
> above the VTOM boundary?
You are right. The ghdb page is allocated by paravisor and its physical
address is above VTOM boundary. Will add a comment to describe this.
Thanks for suggestion.
>
>> @@ -167,6 +190,31 @@ static int hv_cpu_die(unsigned int cpu)
>> {
>> struct hv_reenlightenment_control re_ctrl;
>> unsigned int new_cpu;
>> + unsigned long flags;
>> + void **input_arg;
>> + void *pg;
>> + void **ghcb_va = NULL;
>> +
>> + local_irq_save(flags);
>> + input_arg = (void **)this_cpu_ptr(hyperv_pcpu_input_arg);
>> + pg = *input_arg;
>
> Pg is never used later on, why is it set?
Sorry for noise. This should be removed during rebase and will fix in
the next version.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists