netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] net: build all switchdev drivers as modules when the bridge is a module

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 3 Aug 2021 11:58:19 +0000
From:   Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
To:     Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
CC:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>,
        Lars Povlsen <lars.povlsen@...rochip.com>,
        Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@...rochip.com>,
        Microchip Linux Driver Support <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
        Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>,
        Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...dia.com>,
        Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...dia.com>,
        Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>,
        Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: build all switchdev drivers as modules when
 the bridge is a module

On Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 02:18:38PM +0300, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> In my opinion, the problem is a bit bigger here than just fixing the build :(
> 
> In case, of ^cpsw the switchdev mode is kinda optional and in many cases
> (especially for testing purposes, NFS) the multi-mac mode is still preferable mode.
> 
> There were no such tight dependency between switchdev drivers and bridge core before and switchdev serviced as
> independent, notification based layer between them, so ^cpsw still can be "Y" and bridge can be "M".
> Now for mostly every kernel build configuration the CONFIG_BRIDGE will need to be set as "Y", or we will have
> to update drivers to support build with BRIDGE=n and maintain separate builds for networking vs non-networking testing.
> But is this enough? Wouldn't it cause 'chain reaction' required to add more and more "Y" options (like CONFIG_VLAN_8021Q)?
> 
> PS. Just to be sure we on the same page - ARM builds will be forced (with this patch) to have CONFIG_TI_CPSW_SWITCHDEV=m
> and so all our automation testing will just fail with omap2plus_defconfig.

I didn't realize it is such a big use case to have the bridge built as
module and cpsw as built-in. I will send a patch that converts the
switchdev_bridge_port_{,un}offload functions to simply emit a blocking
switchdev notifier which the bridge processes (a la SWITCHDEV_FDB_ADD_TO_BRIDGE),
therefore making switchdev and the bridge loosely coupled in order to
keep your setup the way it was before.