[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210806154721.0333f733@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2021 15:47:21 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@...aro.org>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
ryazanov.s.a@...il.com, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: wwan: mhi_wwan_ctrl: Fix possible
deadlock
On Fri, 6 Aug 2021 12:35:09 +0200 Loic Poulain wrote:
> Lockdep detected possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario:
>
> CPU0 CPU1
> ---- ----
> lock(&mhiwwan->rx_lock);
> local_irq_disable();
> lock(&mhi_cntrl->pm_lock);
> lock(&mhiwwan->rx_lock);
> <Interrupt>
> lock(&mhi_cntrl->pm_lock);
>
> *** DEADLOCK ***
>
> To prevent this we need to disable the soft-interrupts when taking
> the rx_lock.
>
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Fixes: fa588eba632d ("net: Add Qcom WWAN control driver")
> Reported-by: Thomas Perrot <thomas.perrot@...tlin.com>
> Signed-off-by: Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@...aro.org>
This is for net, right? Despite it's subject annotation?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists