[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210810195550.261189b3@thinkpad>
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2021 19:55:50 +0200
From: Marek BehĂșn <kabel@...nel.org>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>, andrew@...n.ch,
anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com, bigeasy@...utronix.de,
davem@...emloft.net, dvorax.fuxbrumer@...ux.intel.com,
f.fainelli@...il.com, jacek.anaszewski@...il.com, kuba@...nel.org,
kurt@...utronix.de, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, sasha.neftin@...el.com,
vinicius.gomes@...el.com, vitaly.lifshits@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 5/5] igc: Export LEDs
On Tue, 10 Aug 2021 19:29:27 +0200
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> wrote:
> So "r8159-0300:green:activity" would be closer to the naming we want,
> but lets not do that, we really want this to be similar to what others
> are doing, and that probably means "ethphy3:green:activity" AFAICT.
Pavel, one point of the discussion is that in this case the LED is
controlled by MAC, not PHY. So the question is whether we want to do
"ethmacN" (in addition to "ethphyN").
Marek
Powered by blists - more mailing lists