[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <OS0PR01MB59222DD93A66863B561C69C086C09@OS0PR01MB5922.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2021 17:33:15 +0000
From: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>
To: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@....ru>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...il.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@...russia.ru>,
Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Yuusuke Ashizuka <ashiduka@...itsu.com>,
Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
Chris Paterson <Chris.Paterson2@...esas.com>,
Biju Das <biju.das@...renesas.com>,
Prabhakar Mahadev Lad <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next v3 2/9] ravb: Add struct ravb_hw_info to driver
data
Hi Sergei,
> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 2/9] ravb: Add struct ravb_hw_info to
> driver data
>
> On 8/18/21 10:07 PM, Biju Das wrote:
>
> > The DMAC and EMAC blocks of Gigabit Ethernet IP found on RZ/G2L SoC
> > are similar to the R-Car Ethernet AVB IP. With a few changes in the
> > driver we can support both IPs.
> >
> > This patch adds the struct ravb_hw_info to hold hw features, driver
> > data and function pointers to support both the IPs. It also replaces
> > the driver data chip type with struct ravb_hw_info by moving chip type
> to it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
> > ---
> > v2->v3:
> > * Retained Rb tag from Andrew, since there is no functionality change
> > apart from just splitting the patch into 2. Also updated the commit
> > description.
> > v2:
> > * Incorporated Andrew and Sergei's review comments for making it
> smaller patch
> > and provided detailed description.
>
> [...]
> > static inline u32 ravb_read(struct net_device *ndev, enum ravb_reg
> > reg) diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c
> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c
> > index 94eb9136752d..b6554e5e13af 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c
> [...]
> > @@ -2113,7 +2122,7 @@ static int ravb_probe(struct platform_device
> *pdev)
> > }
> > }
> >
> > - priv->chip_id = chip_id;
> > + priv->chip_id = info->chip_id;
>
> Do we still need priv->chip_id?
The patch currently merged is preparation patch, subsequent patch will replace
all the chip_id in ravb_main with hardware features and driver features.
After that both priv->chip_id and info_chipid is not required for ravb_main.c
However ptp driver[1] still uses it, by adding a feature bit we can replace
that as well. So going forward, there won't be any priv->chip_id or info->chip_id.
Does it makes sense?
[1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_ptp.c?h=v5.14-rc6#n200
Regards,
Biju
>
> > priv->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
> > if (IS_ERR(priv->clk)) {
> [...]
>
> Reviewed-by: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@....ru>
>
> [...]
>
> MBR, Sergey
Powered by blists - more mailing lists