netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 12/16] selftests: xsk: remove cleanup at end of program

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210819092849.GB32204@ranger.igk.intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 19 Aug 2021 11:28:49 +0200
From:   Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>
To:     Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...il.com>
Cc:     magnus.karlsson@...el.com, bjorn@...nel.org, ast@...nel.org,
        daniel@...earbox.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        jonathan.lemon@...il.com, ciara.loftus@...el.com,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org, yhs@...com, andrii@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 12/16] selftests: xsk: remove cleanup at end
 of program

On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 11:27:25AM +0200, Magnus Karlsson wrote:
> From: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>
> 
> Remove the cleanup right before the program/process exits as this will
> trigger the cleanup without us having to write or maintain any
> code. The application is not a library, so let us benefit from that.

Not a fan of that, I'd rather keep things tidy, but you're right that
dropping this logic won't hurt us.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.c | 29 +++++-------------------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.c
> index 8ff24472ef1e..c1bb03e0ca07 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.c
> @@ -1041,28 +1041,24 @@ static void run_pkt_test(int mode, int type)
>  int main(int argc, char **argv)
>  {
>  	struct rlimit _rlim = { RLIM_INFINITY, RLIM_INFINITY };
> -	bool failure = false;
>  	int i, j;
>  
>  	if (setrlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, &_rlim))
>  		exit_with_error(errno);
>  
> -	for (int i = 0; i < MAX_INTERFACES; i++) {
> +	for (i = 0; i < MAX_INTERFACES; i++) {
>  		ifdict[i] = malloc(sizeof(struct ifobject));
>  		if (!ifdict[i])
>  			exit_with_error(errno);
>  
>  		ifdict[i]->ifdict_index = i;
>  		ifdict[i]->xsk_arr = calloc(2, sizeof(struct xsk_socket_info *));
> -		if (!ifdict[i]->xsk_arr) {
> -			failure = true;
> -			goto cleanup;
> -		}
> +		if (!ifdict[i]->xsk_arr)
> +			exit_with_error(errno);
> +
>  		ifdict[i]->umem_arr = calloc(2, sizeof(struct xsk_umem_info *));
> -		if (!ifdict[i]->umem_arr) {
> -			failure = true;
> -			goto cleanup;
> -		}
> +		if (!ifdict[i]->umem_arr)
> +			exit_with_error(errno);
>  	}
>  
>  	setlocale(LC_ALL, "");
> @@ -1081,19 +1077,6 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> -cleanup:
> -	for (int i = 0; i < MAX_INTERFACES; i++) {
> -		if (ifdict[i]->ns_fd != -1)
> -			close(ifdict[i]->ns_fd);
> -		free(ifdict[i]->xsk_arr);
> -		free(ifdict[i]->umem_arr);
> -		free(ifdict[i]);
> -	}
> -
> -	if (failure)
> -		exit_with_error(errno);
> -
>  	ksft_exit_pass();
> -
>  	return 0;
>  }
> -- 
> 2.29.0
>