netdev - RE: [RFC v2 net-next 3/8] net: mscc: ocelot: set vcap IS2 chain to goto PSFP chain

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <DB8PR04MB5785C58BDBD502C78ABCDB89F0C09@DB8PR04MB5785.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Thu, 19 Aug 2021 09:49:54 +0000
From:   Xiaoliang Yang <xiaoliang.yang_1@....com>
To:     Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
CC:     "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "allan.nielsen@...rochip.com" <allan.nielsen@...rochip.com>,
        "joergen.andreasen@...rochip.com" <joergen.andreasen@...rochip.com>,
        "UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com" <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>,
        "vinicius.gomes@...el.com" <vinicius.gomes@...el.com>,
        "michael.chan@...adcom.com" <michael.chan@...adcom.com>,
        "vishal@...lsio.com" <vishal@...lsio.com>,
        "saeedm@...lanox.com" <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
        "jiri@...lanox.com" <jiri@...lanox.com>,
        "idosch@...lanox.com" <idosch@...lanox.com>,
        "alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com" <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        "kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>, Po Liu <po.liu@....com>,
        Leo Li <leoyang.li@....com>
Subject: RE: [RFC v2 net-next 3/8] net: mscc: ocelot: set vcap IS2 chain to
 goto PSFP chain



On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 22:55:23PM +0800, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> > @@ -353,7 +364,7 @@ static int ocelot_flower_parse_action(struct
> > ocelot *ocelot, int port,
> >
> >  	if (filter->goto_target == -1) {
> >  		if ((filter->block_id == VCAP_IS2 && filter->lookup == 1) ||
> > -		    chain == 0) {
> > +		    chain == 0 || filter->block_id == PSFP_BLOCK_ID) {
> >  			allow_missing_goto_target = true;
> 
> I would like to not allow missing "goto" targets for new filter chains.
> 
> Due to legacy support we must keep support for VCAP IS2 on chain 0, but ever
> since we added the ability to offload multiple chains corresponding to multiple
> hardware blocks, we should really use that precise chain ID, and chain 0 should
> just goto the first used chain in the pipeline.
> 
> Makes sense?
> 
Because the PSFP chain is the last chain now, I allow missing "goto" targets. Once we add a new chain like FRER, I will delete this allow missing "goto" for PSFP block chain.

Thanks,
Xiaoliang