[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210823194459.GC1006065@nvidia.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2021 16:44:59 -0300
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To: Mark Zhang <markzhang@...dia.com>
Cc: dledford@...hat.com, saeedm@...dia.com, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, aharonl@...dia.com, netao@...dia.com,
leonro@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next 10/10] RDMA/nldev: Add support to get current
enabled optional counters
On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 02:24:28PM +0300, Mark Zhang wrote:
> diff --git a/include/uapi/rdma/rdma_netlink.h b/include/uapi/rdma/rdma_netlink.h
> index 79e6ca87d2e0..57f39d8fe434 100644
> +++ b/include/uapi/rdma/rdma_netlink.h
> @@ -557,6 +557,8 @@ enum rdma_nldev_attr {
> RDMA_NLDEV_ATTR_STAT_OPCOUNTER_ENTRY, /* nested table */
> RDMA_NLDEV_ATTR_STAT_OPCOUNTER_ENTRY_NAME, /* string */
> RDMA_NLDEV_ATTR_STAT_OPCOUNTER_ENTRY_VALUE, /* u64 */
> + RDMA_NLDEV_ATTR_STAT_OP_MODE_LIST, /* u8 */
> + RDMA_NLDEV_ATTR_STAT_OP_MODE_LIST_SUPPORTED, /* u8 */
See, here - shouldn't manipulation of MODE_LIST be done by a normal
RDMA_NLDEV_CMD_STAT_SET with the new MODE_LIST array? This doesn't seem
netlinky at all..
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists