netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] net: bridge: replace __vlan_hwaccel_put_tag with skb_vlan

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 23 Aug 2021 18:12:31 +0900
From:   Kangmin Park <l4stpr0gr4m@...il.com>
To:     Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...dia.com>
Cc:     Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...dia.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: bridge: replace __vlan_hwaccel_put_tag with skb_vlan_push

2021년 8월 23일 (월) 오후 6:00, Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...dia.com>님이 작성:
>
> On 23/08/2021 09:19, Kangmin Park wrote:
>
> This changes behaviour though, I don't like changing code just for the sake of it.
> Perhaps the author had a reason to use hwaccel_put_tag instead. Before we would
> just put hwaccel tag, now if there already is hwaccel tag we'll push it inside
> the skb and then push the new tag in hwaccel. In fact I think you can even trigger
> the warning inside skb_vlan_push, so:
>
> Nacked-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...dia.com>
>
>

Thanks for the review. I got it.
Then, how about cleanup by changing return type of
br_handle_ingress_vlan_tunnel()?
This function is only referenced in br_handle_frame(), and goto drop
when it return
non-zero. But, the ingress function always return 0, there is no
meaning for now.
If you think the cleanup is worth it, I'll send you a v2 patch.

Regards.