[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdUEeZjfJgpXpO6qcAyuGp64wxyxiuLjUosVcRfG8=2s6w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2021 11:14:19 +0200
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...il.com>,
Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@...russia.ru>,
Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Yuusuke Ashizuka <ashiduka@...itsu.com>,
Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
Chris Paterson <Chris.Paterson2@...esas.com>,
Biju Das <biju.das@...renesas.com>,
Prabhakar Mahadev Lad <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 3/9] ravb: Add aligned_tx to struct ravb_hw_info
Hi Biju,
On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 9:08 PM Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com> wrote:
> R-Car Gen2 needs a 4byte aligned address for the transmission buffer,
> whereas R-Car Gen3 doesn't have any such restriction.
>
> Add aligned_tx to struct ravb_hw_info to select the driver to choose
> between aligned and unaligned tx buffers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>
> Reviewed-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
Thanks for your patch, which is now commit 68ca3c923213b908 ("ravb:
Add aligned_tx to struct ravb_hw_info") in net-next.
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb.h
> @@ -990,6 +990,7 @@ enum ravb_chip_id {
>
> struct ravb_hw_info {
> enum ravb_chip_id chip_id;
> + unsigned aligned_tx: 1;
> };
>
> struct ravb_private {
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c
> index b6554e5e13af..dbccf2cd89b2 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c
> @@ -1930,6 +1930,7 @@ static const struct ravb_hw_info ravb_gen3_hw_info = {
>
> static const struct ravb_hw_info ravb_gen2_hw_info = {
> .chip_id = RCAR_GEN2,
> + .aligned_tx = 1,
> };
>
> static const struct of_device_id ravb_match_table[] = {
> @@ -2140,7 +2141,7 @@ static int ravb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> ndev->max_mtu = 2048 - (ETH_HLEN + VLAN_HLEN + ETH_FCS_LEN);
> ndev->min_mtu = ETH_MIN_MTU;
>
> - priv->num_tx_desc = info->chip_id == RCAR_GEN2 ?
> + priv->num_tx_desc = info->aligned_tx ?
> NUM_TX_DESC_GEN2 : NUM_TX_DESC_GEN3;
At first look, this change does not seem to match the patch description.
Upon a deeper look, it is correct, as num_tx_desc is also used to
control alignment.
But now NUM_TX_DESC_GEN[23] no longer match their use.
Perhaps they should be renamed, or replaced by hardcoded values,
with a comment?
/*
* FIXME: Explain the relationship between alignment and number of buffers
*/
priv->num_tx_desc = info->aligned_tx ? 2 : 1;
>
> /* Set function */
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists