[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a11wvEhoEutCNBs5NqiZ2VUA1r-oE1CKBBaYbu_abr4Aw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 12:55:25 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ptp: ocp: don't allow on S390
On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 11:48 PM Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> On 8/20/21 8:31 AM, Richard Cochran wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 12:45:42PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >
> >> I would also suggest removing all the 'imply' statements, they
> >> usually don't do what the original author intended anyway.
> >> If there is a compile-time dependency with those drivers,
> >> it should be 'depends on', otherwise they can normally be
> >> left out.
> >
> > +1
>
> Hi,
>
> Removing the "imply" statements is simple enough and the driver
> still builds cleanly without them, so Yes, they aren't needed here.
>
> Removing the SPI dependency is also clean.
>
> The driver does use I2C, MTD, and SERIAL_8250 interfaces, so they
> can't be removed without some other driver changes, like using
> #ifdef/#endif (or #if IS_ENABLED()) blocks and some function stubs.
If the SERIAL_8250 dependency is actually required, then using
'depends on' for this is probably better than an IS_ENABLED() check.
The 'select' is definitely misplaced here, that doesn't even work when
the dependencies fo 8250 itself are not met, and it does force-enable
the entire TTY subsystem.
Arnd
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists