lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 26 Aug 2021 21:39:13 +0200
From:   Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To:     Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>,
        "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>, Daniel Xu <dxu@...uu.xyz>,
        Viktor Malik <vmalik@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v4 18/27] bpf, x64: Store properly return value for trampoline with multi func programs

When we have multi func program attached, the trampoline
switched to the function model of the multi func program.

This breaks already attached standard programs, for example
when we attach following program:

  SEC("fexit/bpf_fentry_test2")
  int BPF_PROG(test1, int a, __u64 b, int ret)

the trampoline pushes on stack args 'a' and 'b' and return
value 'ret'.

When following multi func program is attached to bpf_fentry_test2:

  SEC("fexit.multi/bpf_fentry_test*")
  int BPF_PROG(test2, __u64 a, __u64 b, __u64 c, __u64 d,
                       __u64 e, __u64 f, int ret)

the trampoline takes this program model and pushes all 6 args
and return value on stack.

But we still have the original 'test1' program attached, that
expects 'ret' value where there's 'c' argument now:

  test1(a, b, c)

To fix that we simply overwrite 'c' argument with 'ret' value,
so test1 is called as expected and test2 gets called as:

  test2(a, b, ret, d, e, f, ret)

which is ok, because 'c' is not defined for bpf_fentry_test2
anyway.

Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
---
 arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 include/linux/bpf.h         |  1 +
 kernel/bpf/trampoline.c     |  1 +
 3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index 9f31197780ae..3f7911a92d62 100644
--- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -1744,7 +1744,7 @@ static void restore_regs(const struct btf_func_model *m, u8 **prog, int nr_args,
 }
 
 static int invoke_bpf_prog(const struct btf_func_model *m, u8 **pprog,
-			   struct bpf_prog *p, int stack_size, bool mod_ret)
+			   struct bpf_prog *p, int stack_size, bool mod_ret, int args_off)
 {
 	u8 *prog = *pprog;
 	u8 *jmp_insn;
@@ -1780,9 +1780,14 @@ static int invoke_bpf_prog(const struct btf_func_model *m, u8 **pprog,
 	/* BPF_TRAMP_MODIFY_RETURN trampolines can modify the return
 	 * of the previous call which is then passed on the stack to
 	 * the next BPF program.
+	 * Store the return value also to original args' end in case
+	 * we have multi func programs in trampoline.
 	 */
-	if (mod_ret)
+	if (mod_ret) {
 		emit_stx(&prog, BPF_DW, BPF_REG_FP, BPF_REG_0, -8);
+		if (args_off)
+			emit_stx(&prog, BPF_DW, BPF_REG_FP, BPF_REG_0, -args_off);
+	}
 
 	/* replace 2 nops with JE insn, since jmp target is known */
 	jmp_insn[0] = X86_JE;
@@ -1834,7 +1839,7 @@ static int invoke_bpf(const struct btf_func_model *m, u8 **pprog,
 	u8 *prog = *pprog;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < tp->nr_progs; i++) {
-		if (invoke_bpf_prog(m, &prog, tp->progs[i], stack_size, false))
+		if (invoke_bpf_prog(m, &prog, tp->progs[i], stack_size, false, 0))
 			return -EINVAL;
 	}
 	*pprog = prog;
@@ -1843,7 +1848,7 @@ static int invoke_bpf(const struct btf_func_model *m, u8 **pprog,
 
 static int invoke_bpf_mod_ret(const struct btf_func_model *m, u8 **pprog,
 			      struct bpf_tramp_progs *tp, int stack_size,
-			      u8 **branches)
+			      u8 **branches, int args_off)
 {
 	u8 *prog = *pprog;
 	int i;
@@ -1853,8 +1858,15 @@ static int invoke_bpf_mod_ret(const struct btf_func_model *m, u8 **pprog,
 	 */
 	emit_mov_imm32(&prog, false, BPF_REG_0, 0);
 	emit_stx(&prog, BPF_DW, BPF_REG_FP, BPF_REG_0, -8);
+
+	/* Store the return value also to original args' end in case
+	 * we have multi func programs in trampoline.
+	 */
+	if (args_off)
+		emit_stx(&prog, BPF_DW, BPF_REG_FP, BPF_REG_0, -args_off);
+
 	for (i = 0; i < tp->nr_progs; i++) {
-		if (invoke_bpf_prog(m, &prog, tp->progs[i], stack_size, true))
+		if (invoke_bpf_prog(m, &prog, tp->progs[i], stack_size, true, args_off))
 			return -EINVAL;
 
 		/* mod_ret prog stored return value into [rbp - 8]. Emit:
@@ -1942,7 +1954,7 @@ int arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, void *image, void *i
 				struct bpf_tramp_progs *tprogs,
 				void *orig_call)
 {
-	int ret, i, nr_args = m->nr_args;
+	int ret, i, args_off = 0, nr_args = m->nr_args;
 	int stack_size = nr_args * 8;
 	struct bpf_tramp_progs *fentry = &tprogs[BPF_TRAMP_FENTRY];
 	struct bpf_tramp_progs *fexit = &tprogs[BPF_TRAMP_FEXIT];
@@ -1958,6 +1970,13 @@ int arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, void *image, void *i
 	    (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_SKIP_FRAME))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
+	/* if m->nr_args_orig != 0, then we have multi prog model and
+	 * we need to also store return value at the end of standard
+	 * trampoline's arguments
+	 */
+	if (m->nr_args_orig && m->nr_args > m->nr_args_orig)
+		args_off = (m->nr_args - m->nr_args_orig) * 8 + 8;
+
 	if (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_CALL_ORIG)
 		stack_size += 8; /* room for return value of orig_call */
 
@@ -2015,7 +2034,7 @@ int arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, void *image, void *i
 			return -ENOMEM;
 
 		if (invoke_bpf_mod_ret(m, &prog, fmod_ret, stack_size,
-				       branches)) {
+				       branches, args_off)) {
 			ret = -EINVAL;
 			goto cleanup;
 		}
@@ -2036,6 +2055,13 @@ int arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, void *image, void *i
 		}
 		/* remember return value in a stack for bpf prog to access */
 		emit_stx(&prog, BPF_DW, BPF_REG_FP, BPF_REG_0, -8);
+
+		/* store return value also to original args' end in case we have
+		 * multi func programs in trampoline
+		 */
+		if (args_off)
+			emit_stx(&prog, BPF_DW, BPF_REG_FP, BPF_REG_0, -args_off);
+
 		im->ip_after_call = prog;
 		memcpy(prog, x86_nops[5], X86_PATCH_SIZE);
 		prog += X86_PATCH_SIZE;
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index 3ce4656e2057..373f45ae7dce 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -563,6 +563,7 @@ struct btf_func_model {
 	u8 ret_size;
 	u8 nr_args;
 	u8 arg_size[MAX_BPF_FUNC_ARGS];
+	u8 nr_args_orig;
 };
 
 /* Restore arguments before returning from trampoline to let original function
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c b/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c
index 6ff5c2512f91..308d58e698be 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c
@@ -398,6 +398,7 @@ static bool needs_multi_model(struct bpf_trampoline *tr, struct btf_func_model *
 	if (tr->func.model.nr_args >= multi->func.model.nr_args)
 		return false;
 	memcpy(new, &multi->func.model, sizeof(*new));
+	new->nr_args_orig = tr->func.model.nr_args;
 	return true;
 }
 
-- 
2.31.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ