netdev - Re: Question about inet_rtm_getroute_build

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 27 Aug 2021 09:46:08 -0700
From:   David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To:     Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: Question about inet_rtm_getroute_build_skb()

On 8/27/21 8:09 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> 
> 
> On 8/26/21 9:37 PM, David Ahern wrote:
>> On 8/26/21 6:16 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>>> Hi Roopa
>>>
>>> I noticed inet_rtm_getroute_build_skb() has this endian issue 
>>> when building an UDP header.
>>>
>>> Would the following fix break user space ?
>>
>> I do not see how. As I recall this is only for going through
>> ip_route_input_rcu and ip_route_output_key_hash_rcu and a call to
>> fib4_rules_early_flow_dissect.
>>
> 
> Ah, nice !
> 
> Could we add a test for this feature ?
> I could not really figure out reading the commit changelog how this stuff was used.
> 

tools/testing/selftests/net/fib_rule_tests.sh

I do not see the udp variant, so yes, those should be added.