[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1630248743-13361-1-git-send-email-zhenggy@chinatelecom.cn>
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2021 10:52:23 -0400
From: zhenggy <zhenggy@...natelecom.cn>
To: ncardwell@...gle.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: edumazet@...gle.com, davem@...emloft.net, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org,
dsahern@...nel.org, kuba@...nel.org, ycheng@...gle.com,
zhenggy <zhenggy@...natelecom.cn>
Subject: [PATCH v2] tcp: fix tp->undo_retrans accounting in tcp_sacktag_one()
Commit a71d77e6be1e ("tcp: fix segment accounting when DSACK range covers
multiple segments") fix some DSACK accounting for multiple segments.
In tcp_sacktag_one(), we should also use the actual DSACK rang(pcount)
for tp->undo_retrans accounting.
Fixes: 10d3be569243 ("tcp-tso: do not split TSO packets at retransmit time")
Before that commit, the assumption underlying the tp->undo_retrans--
seems correct, AFAICT.
Signed-off-by: zhenggy <zhenggy@...natelecom.cn>
---
net/ipv4/tcp_input.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
index 3f7bd7a..141e85e 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
@@ -1346,7 +1346,7 @@ static u8 tcp_sacktag_one(struct sock *sk,
if (dup_sack && (sacked & TCPCB_RETRANS)) {
if (tp->undo_marker && tp->undo_retrans > 0 &&
after(end_seq, tp->undo_marker))
- tp->undo_retrans--;
+ tp->undo_retrans = max_t(int, 0, tp->undo_retrans - pcount);
if ((sacked & TCPCB_SACKED_ACKED) &&
before(start_seq, state->reord))
state->reord = start_seq;
--
1.8.3.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists