lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFqZXNsp84kFLDfJfdu5fboB8vMm85FU7BDDjpiqeiJ2WSjWAg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 13 Sep 2021 15:50:21 +0200
From:   Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@...hat.com>
To:     Eugene Syromiatnikov <esyr@...hat.com>
Cc:     Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Antony Antony <antony.antony@...unet.com>,
        Christian Langrock <christian.langrock@...unet.com>,
        Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>,
        SElinux list <selinux@...r.kernel.org>,
        Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>,
        Stephen Smalley <stephen.smalley.work@...il.com>,
        Eric Paris <eparis@...isplace.org>,
        network dev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@...ace.io>,
        Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] include/uapi/linux/xfrm.h: Fix XFRM_MSG_MAPPING ABI breakage

On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 12:23 PM Eugene Syromiatnikov <esyr@...hat.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 09:16:39AM +0200, Ondrej Mosnacek wrote:
> > Perhaps it would be a good idea to put a comment here to make it less
> > likely that this repeats in the future. Something like:
> >
> > /* IMPORTANT: Only insert new entries right above this line, otherwise
> > you break ABI! */
>
> Well, this statement is true for (almost) every UAPI-exposed enum, and
> netlink is vast and relies on enums heavily.  I think it is already
> mentioned somewhere in the documentation, and in the end it falls on the
> shoulders of the maintainers—to pay additional attention to UAPI changes.

Ok, fair enough.

-- 
Ondrej Mosnacek
Software Engineer, Linux Security - SELinux kernel
Red Hat, Inc.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ