[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <SJ0PR11MB50088886CB7E54A9A9E719C7D7DB9@SJ0PR11MB5008.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2021 23:17:09 +0000
From: "Kumar, M Chetan" <m.chetan.kumar@...el.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"loic.poulain@...aro.org" <loic.poulain@...aro.org>,
"ryazanov.s.a@...il.com" <ryazanov.s.a@...il.com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next] Revert "net: wwan: iosm: firmware flashing and
coredump collection"
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
> Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2021 3:28 AM
> To: davem@...emloft.net
> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org; loic.poulain@...aro.org; ryazanov.s.a@...il.com;
> Kumar, M Chetan <m.chetan.kumar@...el.com>; Jakub Kicinski
> <kuba@...nel.org>
> Subject: [PATCH net-next] Revert "net: wwan: iosm: firmware flashing and
> coredump collection"
>
> The devlink parameters are not the right mechanism to pass
> extra parameters to device flashing. The params added are
> also undocumented.
Could you please suggest us how should we pass extra parameters ?
Also I was about to submit the patch for documentation!!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists