[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFd5g45=vkZL-H3EDrvYXvhMM2ekM_CBGN0ySyKitq=z+V+EwQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2021 23:16:04 -0700
From: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...el.com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Ariel Elior <aelior@...vell.com>,
GR-everest-linux-l2@...vell.com, Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
KUnit Development <kunit-dev@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: ipv4/tcp.c:4234:1: error: the frame size of 1152 bytes is larger
than 1024 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=]
On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 10:39 PM Brendan Higgins
<brendanhiggins@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 3:04 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 10:48 PM Brendan Higgins
> > <brendanhiggins@...gle.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 1:55 PM Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 9/8/21 3:24 PM, Brendan Higgins wrote:
[...]
> Alright, I incorporated all the above into a patchset that I think is
> ready to send out, but I had a couple of issues with the above
> suggestions:
>
> - I could not find a config which causes a stacksize warning for
> sdhci-of-aspeed.
> - test_scanf is not a KUnit test.
> - Linus already fixed the thunderbolt test by breaking up the test cases.
>
> I am going to send out patches for the thunderbolt test and for the
> sdhci-of-aspeed test for the sake of completeness, but I am not sure
> if we should merge those two. I'll let y'all decide on the patch
> review.
Just in case I missed any interested parties on this thread, I posted
my patches here:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20210917061104.2680133-1-brendanhiggins@google.com/T/#t
> I only based the thunderbolt and bitfield test fixes on actual patches
> from Arnd, but I think Arnd pretty much did all the work here so I am
> crediting him with a Co-developed-by on all the other patches, so
> Arnd: please follow up on the other patches with a signed-off-by,
> unless you would rather me credit you in some other way.
>
> > Sorry for failing to submit these as a proper patch. If you send a new version,
> > I think you need to make sure you cover all of the above, using whichever
> > change you like best.
>
> I am still going to try to get Linus' suggestion working since it
> actually solves the problem, but I would rather get the above
> suggested fix out there since it is quick and I know it works.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists