netdev - Re: stmmac: Disappointing or normal DMA performance?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CADZJnBZzA9U4dF=zQtDgJrn+u6TU-vqtgCZsxj9+HSa5EFhiAA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 22 Sep 2021 11:59:19 -0700
From:   John Smith <4eur0pe2006@...il.com>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: stmmac: Disappointing or normal DMA performance?

Yes, I have played with the RX coal values. My understanding is that
there is a hardware watchdog to trigger the DMA IRQ with a maximum
value of MAX_DMA_RIWT == 0xff.

rx_riwt = stmmac_usec2riwt(ec->rx_coalesce_usecs, priv);

if ((rx_riwt > MAX_DMA_RIWT) || (rx_riwt < MIN_DMA_RIWT))
return -EINVAL;

This seems to lead to 326us. My 30000 frames per second arrive every
33us and 326 / 33 ~ 10 frames per interrupt...

In other words, I have the feeling that the answer to my subject
question is both: it's normal and it's disappointing.

Can ST confirm the hardware limit (the internal RX FIFO I guess) that
it's not possible to do better than 10 1280-byte frames per DMA
interrupt in my case?

John

On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 7:12 AM Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> wrote:
>
> > Is there a way to increase the ratio of packets / IRQs? I want fewer
> > IRQs with more packets as the current performance overloads my
> > embedded chip,
>
> Have you played with ethtool -c/-C.
>
>      Andrew