[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <76bcc40e-f302-196f-5d83-df2aa0d9d963@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 09:57:58 -0400
From: Jes Sorensen <jes.sorensen@...il.com>
To: Chris Chiu <chris.chiu@...onical.com>, kvalo@...eaurora.org,
davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org
Cc: linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtl8xxxu: Use lower tx rates for the ack packet
On 9/30/21 6:44 AM, Chris Chiu wrote:
> According to the Realtek propritary driver and the rtw88 driver, the
> tx rates of the ack (includes block ack) are initialized with lower
> tx rates (no HT rates) which is set by the RRSR register value. In
> real cases, ack rate higher than current tx rate could lead to
> difficulty for the receiving end to receive management/control frames.
> The retransmission rate would be higher then expected when the driver
> is acting as receiver and the RSSI is not good.
>
> Cross out higer rates for ack packet before implementing dynamic rrsr
> configuration
Theory of this looks sound to me, but there's an implementation detail,
see below.
> Signed-off-by: Chris Chiu <chris.chiu@...onical.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c | 7 ++++++-
> drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_regs.h | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c
> index 774341b0005a..413cccd88f5c 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c
> @@ -4460,13 +4460,18 @@ void rtl8xxxu_gen1_init_aggregation(struct rtl8xxxu_priv *priv)
>
> static void rtl8xxxu_set_basic_rates(struct rtl8xxxu_priv *priv, u32 rate_cfg)
> {
> + struct ieee80211_hw *hw = priv->hw;
> u32 val32;
> u8 rate_idx = 0;
>
> rate_cfg &= RESPONSE_RATE_BITMAP_ALL;
>
> val32 = rtl8xxxu_read32(priv, REG_RESPONSE_RATE_SET);
> - val32 &= ~RESPONSE_RATE_BITMAP_ALL;
> + val32 = rtl8xxxu_read32(priv, REG_RESPONSE_RATE_SET);
You're reading REG_RESPONSE_RATE_SET twice.
Cheers,
Jes
Powered by blists - more mailing lists