[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a891e733157ca7e631ca120ebae15557a6f05738.camel@mediatek.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2021 09:36:54 +0800
From: Jason-ch Chen <jason-ch.chen@...iatek.com>
To: Hayes Wang <hayeswang@...ltek.com>,
"matthias.bgg@...il.com" <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
CC: "linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
"Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com"
<Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com>,
"hsinyi@...gle.com" <hsinyi@...gle.com>,
nic_swsd <nic_swsd@...ltek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] r8152: stop submitting rx for -EPROTO
On Thu, 2021-09-30 at 02:41 +0000, Hayes Wang wrote:
> Jason-ch Chen <jason-ch.chen@...iatek.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2021 5:53 PM
>
> [...]
> > Hi Hayes,
> >
> > Sometimes Rx submits rapidly and the USB kernel driver of
> > opensource
> > cannot receive any disconnect event due to CPU heavy loading, which
> > finally causes a system crash.
> > Do you have any suggestions to modify the r8152 driver to prevent
> > this
> > situation happened?
>
> Do you mind to try the following patch?
> It avoids to re-submit RX immediately.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/usb/r8152.c b/drivers/net/usb/r8152.c
> index 60ba9b734055..bfe00af8283f 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/usb/r8152.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/usb/r8152.c
> @@ -767,6 +767,7 @@ enum rtl8152_flags {
> PHY_RESET,
> SCHEDULE_TASKLET,
> GREEN_ETHERNET,
> + SCHEDULE_NAPI,
> };
>
> #define DEVICE_ID_THINKPAD_THUNDERBOLT3_DOCK_GEN2 0x3082
> @@ -1770,6 +1771,14 @@ static void read_bulk_callback(struct urb
> *urb)
> rtl_set_unplug(tp);
> netif_device_detach(tp->netdev);
> return;
> + case -EPROTO:
> + urb->actual_length = 0;
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&tp->rx_lock, flags);
> + list_add_tail(&agg->list, &tp->rx_done);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tp->rx_lock, flags);
> + set_bit(SCHEDULE_NAPI, &tp->flags);
> + schedule_delayed_work(&tp->schedule, 1);
> + return;
> case -ENOENT:
> return; /* the urb is in unlink state */
> case -ETIME:
> @@ -2425,6 +2434,7 @@ static int rx_bottom(struct r8152 *tp, int
> budget)
> if (list_empty(&tp->rx_done))
> goto out1;
>
> + clear_bit(SCHEDULE_NAPI, &tp->flags);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rx_queue);
> spin_lock_irqsave(&tp->rx_lock, flags);
> list_splice_init(&tp->rx_done, &rx_queue);
> @@ -2441,7 +2451,7 @@ static int rx_bottom(struct r8152 *tp, int
> budget)
>
> agg = list_entry(cursor, struct rx_agg, list);
> urb = agg->urb;
> - if (urb->actual_length < ETH_ZLEN)
> + if (urb->status != 0 || urb->actual_length < ETH_ZLEN)
> goto submit;
>
> agg_free = rtl_get_free_rx(tp, GFP_ATOMIC);
> @@ -6643,6 +6653,10 @@ static void rtl_work_func_t(struct work_struct
> *work)
> netif_carrier_ok(tp->netdev))
> tasklet_schedule(&tp->tx_tl);
>
> + if (test_and_clear_bit(SCHEDULE_NAPI, &tp->flags) &&
> + !list_empty(&tp->rx_done))
> + napi_schedule(&tp->napi);
> +
> mutex_unlock(&tp->control);
>
> out1:
>
>
> Best Regards,
> Hayes
Hi,
This patch has been verified.
It did avoid Rx re-submit immediately.
Thanks,
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists