[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211006124919.48b46660@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2021 12:49:19 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>,
Marcin Wojtas <mw@...ihalf.com>,
Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/9] of: net: move of_net under net/
On Wed, 6 Oct 2021 14:02:42 -0500 Rob Herring wrote:
> > > Okay, then just move it for now.
> > >
> > > I suspect though that most of these can either be dropped or replaced
> > > with just 'OF' dependency.
> >
> > I have something that builds with allmodconfig :) see below.
>
> Sparc is the arch to try. That's generally we we get tripped up with OF options.
Thanks for the hint, sparc (non-64) allmodconfig builds fine (well, it
spits out this:
<stdin>:1515:2: warning: #warning syscall clone3 not implemented [-Wcpp]
arch/sparc/boot/Makefile:26: FORCE prerequisite is missing
but that seems unrelated).
Is there any other sparc config worth building?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists