netdev - Re: [PATCH 00/14] Add functional support for Gigabit Ethernet driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 10 Oct 2021 12:58:23 +0300
From:   Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@....ru>
To:     Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC:     Prabhakar Mahadev Lad <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>,
        "Andrew Lunn" <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        "Adam Ford" <aford173@...il.com>,
        Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org" 
        <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Chris Paterson <Chris.Paterson2@...esas.com>,
        Biju Das <biju.das@...renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] Add functional support for Gigabit Ethernet driver

On 10.10.2021 12:25, Biju Das wrote:

[...]
>>>>>> The DMAC and EMAC blocks of Gigabit Ethernet IP found on RZ/G2L SoC
>>>>>> are similar to the R-Car Ethernet AVB IP.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The Gigabit Ethernet IP consists of Ethernet controller (E-MAC),
>>>>>> Internal TCP/IP Offload Engine (TOE)  and Dedicated Direct memory
>>>>>> access controller (DMAC).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> With a few changes in the driver we can support both IPs.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This patch series is aims to add functional support for Gigabit
>>>>>> Ethernet driver by filling all the stubs except set_features.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> set_feature patch will send as separate RFC patch along with
>>>>>> rx_checksum patch, as it needs detailed discussion related to HW
>>>>> checksum.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ref:-
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://jpn01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fp
>>>>>> atc
>>>>>> hwork.kernel.org%2Fproject%2Flinux-renesas-soc%2Flist%2F%3Fseries%3
>>>>>> D55
>>>>>> 7655&amp;data=04%7C01%7Cbiju.das.jz%40bp.renesas.com%7C25bc7b9155d8
>>>>>> 402
>>>>>> a191808d98b5ae62f%7C53d82571da1947e49cb4625a166a4a2a%7C0%7C0%7C6376
>>>>>> 940
>>>>>> 44814904836%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2l
>>>>>> uMz
>>>>>> IiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&amp;sdata=Vktj5v0GvrNf%2BDN
>>>>>> IFs
>>>>>> e6xjCUm6OjtzwHvK3q8aG1E5Y%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>>>>>
>>>>>> RFC->V1:
>>>>>>    * Removed patch#3 will send it as RFC
>>>>>>    * Removed rx_csum functionality from patch#7, will send it as RFC
>>>>>>    * Renamed "nc_queue" -> "nc_queues"
>>>>>>    * Separated the comment patch into 2 separate patches.
>>>>>>    * Documented PFRI register bit
>>>>>>    * Added Sergy's Rb tag
>>>>>
>>>>>      It's Sergey. :-)
>>>>
>>>> My Bad. Sorry will taken care this in future. I need to send V2, as
>>>> accidentally I have added 2 macros in patch #6 As part of RFC
>>>> discussion into v1. I will send V2 to remove this.
>>>
>>>      I'm not seeing patches #2, #4, and #9 in my inboxes... :-/
>>
>>      Seeing them now in the linux-renesas-soc folder in the GMail account.
>> But they should have landed on the OMP account too. :-/
> 
> Can you please confirm latest series[1] lands on your OMP account?
> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=560617

    No, as I've told you already. Was unclear again. :-)

> Regards,
> Biju

MBR, Sergey