[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211012111920.1f3886b2@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 11:19:20 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@....ru>,
Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...il.com>,
Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com>,
Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
Chris Paterson <Chris.Paterson2@...esas.com>,
Biju Das <biju.das@...renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 00/14] Add functional support for Gigabit
Ethernet driver
On Tue, 12 Oct 2021 17:35:59 +0100 Biju Das wrote:
> set_feature patch will send as separate RFC patch along with rx_checksum
> patch, as it needs further discussion related to HW checksum.
Is this part relating to the crash you observed because of TCP csum
offload?
I'm trying to understand the situation before and after this series.
What makes the crash possible to trigger?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists