[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7d3e762e-12e9-bb5c-f242-785047087783@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2021 18:32:37 +0200
From: Karsten Graul <kgraul@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 00/11] net/smc: introduce SMC-Rv2 support
On 14/10/2021 18:09, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Oct 2021 12:17:32 +0200 Karsten Graul wrote:
>> Please apply the following patch series for smc to netdev's net-next tree.
>>
>> SMC-Rv2 support (see https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/6326337)
>> provides routable RoCE support for SMC-R, eliminating the current
>> same-subnet restriction, by exploiting the UDP encapsulation feature
>> of the RoCE adapter hardware.
>>
>> Patch 1 ("net/smc: improved fix wait on already cleared link") is
>> already applied on netdevs net tree but its changes are needed for
>> this series on net-next. The patch is unchanged compared to the
>> version on the net tree.
>
> This series as marked as "Needs ACK" in patchwork, I think my Dave.
> Maybe it is because of the RoCE part, is there a reason not to CC
> linux-rdma on it?
There is no reason for that, I was not aware that I should CC linux-rdma.
I can send a v2 with an extended CC list.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists