netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 00/11] net/smc: introduce SMC-Rv2 support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20211014093619.6c8b63ad@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date:   Thu, 14 Oct 2021 09:36:19 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Karsten Graul <kgraul@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 00/11] net/smc: introduce SMC-Rv2 support

On Thu, 14 Oct 2021 18:32:37 +0200 Karsten Graul wrote:
> On 14/10/2021 18:09, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Tue, 12 Oct 2021 12:17:32 +0200 Karsten Graul wrote:  
> >> Please apply the following patch series for smc to netdev's net-next tree.
> >>
> >> SMC-Rv2 support (see https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/6326337)
> >> provides routable RoCE support for SMC-R, eliminating the current
> >> same-subnet restriction, by exploiting the UDP encapsulation feature
> >> of the RoCE adapter hardware.
> >>
> >> Patch 1 ("net/smc: improved fix wait on already cleared link") is
> >> already applied on netdevs net tree but its changes are needed for
> >> this series on net-next. The patch is unchanged compared to the
> >> version on the net tree.  
> > 
> > This series as marked as "Needs ACK" in patchwork, I think my Dave.
> > Maybe it is because of the RoCE part, is there a reason not to CC
> > linux-rdma on it?  
> 
> There is no reason for that, I was not aware that I should CC linux-rdma.
> I can send a v2 with an extended CC list.

Yeah, let's do that. I'm not sure what the reason for the patchwork
designation was so let's repost with linux-rdma and if nobody complains
we can merge tomorrow morning. Thanks!